Lions make it a rousing finish

Shane Williams © Gallo images
The British and Irish Lions made it an emphatic finish to what before that had been a closely fought series as they ground out a 28-9 victory over the Springboks in the final test in Johannesburg.

It was the biggest Lions win over South Africa since Willie John McBride’s triumphal march through the country in 1974, and equalled the biggest win for the Lions over the Boks, which came in Pretoria on that same tour. It should have been more than enough to ensure that the Lions return to the northern hemisphere feeling proud of themselves, even though they lost the series 2-1.

The Lions scored three tries to nil, and they could even have scored more, so superior were they in every aspect of the game outside of the lineouts, where there was parity. The Boks wore armbands to protest the suspension of lock Bakkies Botha, and there was no denying that the big man was sorely missed. But maybe they should have put more focus on their rugby, and less on the protest, which had effectively been carried off well enough by skipper John Smit at a press conference on the eve of the test.

With Chiliboy Ralepelle installed at hooker instead of Bismarck du Plessis, the absence of Botha was felt even more, with the Lions forwards, as they had at Loftus, getting all the early momentum. Two well taken tries from Shane Williams made it 15-6 to Paul O’Connell’s team, a similar score to last week, but this time there was surely no-one in the stadium who would have bet on a Bok comeback.

The South Africans looked directionless and they looked like a team that is under-coached. They made 10 changes from the previous game, and as some suspected it might be, it was just too many. While the decision to play Wynand Olivier and Jaques Fourie together was the right one, it didn’t make sense to blood the promising young Bulls fullback Zane Kirchner on the same day that you were leaving out your first choice wings.

Morne Steyn, the hero last week with his late penalty goal, was shown up in this match, with his apparent indecision on where he should stand when taking the ball – he was in no-mans land for much of the game – not helping his outside backs.

But it was in the forward battle that the Lions set up this victory, and it left questions over what might have become of the Springboks had the Lions coach got his selections right from the outset. In the time the Lions fielded a physical pack in the second half in Durban the Lions were on top, and again in Pretoria.

In this match, with Simon Shaw and company again contributing handsomely, the Lions simply smashed the Boks backwards. The possession statistics may not have shown it, but in terms of quality of possession, this game was no race.

For a dead rubber, the match, watched by a crowd of 58 000, many of them Lions supporters, it delivered lot. It got off to a frenetic start, with the Lions again employing the multi-phase tactics used in the first two test matches.

There was an early late charge from Shaw on young Kirchner which was not spotted by the referee but which summed up the Lions’ aggressive intent, and the Boks, perhaps because they spent too much time focussing on side-issues this week, were disturbingly behind the pace when it came to intensity.

With young Ralepelle in ahead of Du Plessis at hooker – the latter did come on for the second half – and no Botha to anchor the scrum behind Bok skipper John Smit, it was the Lions who gained the early scrumming ascendancy. Their allround superiority was translated into mistakes made by the Boks, with four penalties in the first eight minutes against the home side having a big impact on the flow of the game.

Ralepelle and Smit were both popped at the first scrum, and it was then that the Boks would have known that they were in for a long afternoon. Stephen Jones slotted a penalty to make the Lions advantage on the scoreboard count, and although Morne Steyn did draw one back for the Boks, it was always the Lions who looked to be in the ascendancy.

Much like the first hour of the previous test, they were always sharper, more intense, more physical than their opponents, and Riki Flutey and Tommy Bowe had good games as the newlook midfield combination.

It was IRB Player of the Year Williams, however, who stole the plaudits with his two well taken tries. The first came after No8 Jamie Heaslip made the initial break and then passed inside, the second came off some superb individual brilliance from Flutey, who put in a well directed kick, gathered it himself and then batted it sideways for Williams to use his pace and score.

Suddenly it was 15-3 and the Boks were up against it, a situation that they rescued only slightly after Shaw was yellow carded for kneeing Fourie du Preez in the back, an act that saw the South African scrumhalf not appear after half-time. A penalty from Steyn on the halftime siren made it 15-6, and in terms of getting a score just before the break, it was reminiscent of Loftus.

Any thought that the Lions would fall away in the second half quickly evaporated into the chilly Johannesburg air, however, when the Lions fronted up and even dominated in the six minutes they had to play without Shaw being present.

Once he did return, the Lions forward dominance was obvious, with the Lions repeatedly mauling the Boks backwards. The Boks did threaten for a while, but when a poor Olivier pass found its way into the hands of Ugo Monye, who ran almost the length of the field, to make it 22-6 with 25 minutes left, the game was effectively over as a contest.

Scores:

British and Irish Lions 28 – Tries: Shane Williams 2 and Ugo Monye; Conversions: Stephen Jones 2; Penalties: Stephen Jones 3.

Springboks 9 – Penalties: Morne Steyn 3.

Read more on the British & Irish Lions page.


Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.
by Russell Brooke July 4, 2009 19:04 GMT
Peter de Villiers has let down the boks and their fans by fielding a B team. "Giving everyone a chance" may sound admirable but a weak performance like this can't do anything for the confidence of our players or supporters. We had the opportunity to set records and continue a great winning streak, instead we embarrased ourselves.
Report this comment
by Geoff Wilson July 4, 2009 20:04 GMT
The video referee reviewing the try finally denied to the Boks with 5 min remaining in he 3rd Lions Test must be the slowest and poorest judge ever seen. At least it was during time out, but how many times did we see the replay, 20 plus? Come on man, make a decision!
Report this comment
by M Ross July 4, 2009 21:50 GMT
I agree with Russell above. De Villiers did not take this game seriously, and in so doing let down the fans and the reputation of SA rugby. The Boks were under the gun from the first scrum, a situation which allowed the Lions to become assertive. Olivier killed too many attacking opportunities by taking the ball into contact and turning it over, and the intercepted lofted pass to Kirshner showed a lack of game perception as the Lions defence was coming up fast. THis looked like a team of individuals playing out of position....Spies on the wing? Very disappointing... and De Villiers will need to wake up before the Tri-nations or Australia and the All Blacks will deliver a serious thumping.
Report this comment
by wesley chibaya July 4, 2009 23:07 GMT
Fair Gavin! Spot on with the changes analysis and the outcome there after. I just do not agree with U trying to down play the band protest. That is a stand that has to be voiced and loudly. I hope the rugby nations that do agree also find a way to do so. If the IRB can not see reason, Then I`m afraid the game we love so much is no more. Good on the Lions to get one back and in good fashion. Great game to watch! Congrats to the Lions once more.
Report this comment
by Selwyn Price July 5, 2009 02:35 GMT
The armband wearing was seriously misguided, and would have been stamped out by any coaching staff that were worth their salary. Saffas need to accept that this is a sport, and not every decision will go their way.
Report this comment
by Christo July 5, 2009 06:10 GMT
Gavin, your summary of the game is spot on! I completely agree with you. We should concentrate on the game and not run onto the field in protest. That is the wrong attitude, which does not help you win games. I do however hope that they will in future treat the SA players fair as this is now really going to far. All in all we missed Bakkies in the front and that combined with the wrong selections on number 2, 4, 8 and on the wings cost SA the game. It was a typical game where nothing worked for SA. We simply did not have the class on the wings to round things of like we did the last two games. One comment to Ross. Spies on wing was the only thing left to do as Nokwe managed to catch one ball during the whole game! Even Os du Randt would have been a better wing on the day! I guess the most difficult decision was to decide which wing to substitute as two tries were scored on right where Ndungane put up an equally poor performance! All credit to the Lions! You were clearly the best team on the park! You can go back home with your chins up high.
Report this comment
by Gunnar July 5, 2009 08:13 GMT
We have been told how important it is to beat the lions....and then field a B team...to give players a chance...why`why? why?
Report this comment
by James Swindells July 5, 2009 16:02 GMT
Fair does to the Lions, they came out to prevent a whitewash and showed their character. I agree with many of the other comments about the ongoing Devilliers blunders. Incompetent is too lenient a comment in my opinion. It shows inexperience and downright arrogance when fielding a second string side against ANY international team. Sadly we got what we deserved. One of the comments about the Bok players trying to score points with the ref during the game is also fair . Play the ball guys leave the refereeing to the man in charge. Great Match, but poor show from the Boks!!
Report this comment
by Raymond Durrett July 5, 2009 19:59 GMT
I'm NO fan of the incompetant PdV who is way out of his depth coaching test rugby BUT...there were certain itches that needed scratching. I disagree playing all the changes was a wrong decision. Having said that - Kirtchner was NOT an itch...he was abysmal for the E-Boks 2 weeks earlier and clearly not ready! His out of hand kicking game was diabolical and he needs a LOT more time and work. Steyn needs the game time to work on his positional play as it is and he is young enough to not need rotating. A lot of truth in the boks heads being off the field. The lack of commitment being shown on the field is heart wrenching for us Bok fans to watch...none of the basics like charging kicks or propper rucking is being done and this is a sign of a troubled side that is NOT a team but simply a collection of individuals. The Bakkies siting was pedantic and in bad taste especially since Heaslip was not sited for possibly a worse version of the same kind of cleaning...BUT...why not win the game for Bakkies instead of wearing arm bands for the cameras. The Lions had no pressure and that showed by them throwing the nut around but regardless of that they showed true heart...they played like a TEAM! Of course having a coach helps!
Report this comment
by wesley chibaya July 5, 2009 22:37 GMT
for the guys here against the protest by the. could U read the Telegraph.
Report this comment
by Brian Jardine July 6, 2009 02:09 GMT
As a Bok fan, I was really let down by this performance. But, I have to say, one thing I do like about Pieter De Villiers (and, it's probably the only thing I like about him), is that he's far less afraid to take some risks as was Jake White. Now, you can say all you want about Jake White winning the RWC in 2007, but don't forget that he did nothing to improve on South Africa's winning record versus the Tri-Nations opposition. Winning the tournament once in four years is not a record the Springboks should be proud of. So, what I think PDV actually did in the favor of the Boks is give a huge opportunity to the other players in the game. Let's not forget, PDV did his job...he won the tournament. So, why not blood some new players and see where they fit. And, from what we can see, Wynand Olivier is definitely an outside center who can crash the ball up and run good lines. I think he'd be great outside Jean. Morne was good, but just needs some time. He'll be one of the best if we don't panic and discard him like we tend to do in SA. I really felt Zane had a bad game. He just looks out of sorts and needs another season at S14 to cement his role in the position. And, really, Chilliboy needs to go. I don't see why he's in the team, other than the obvious. He's played about 200 minutes of rugby, and almost never plays a full 80. I don't get it. He's just not good enough. But, hopefully you all get my point that without us having tested these guys out, we'd never actually have known where these players are. Good job Lions. You can be proud of your win. SA, keep moving forward.
Report this comment
by alexandru campeanu July 6, 2009 08:30 GMT
hurray for the lions. they won ithe battle even if there was a 2-1 pseudo-victory for the boks. the lions won 74 pionts to 63 and 7 essays to the 5 of the boks. they would have won the series if mcgeechan would have better selected the team for the first test and if the referee had ousted bakkes and sckalk for their intentional foul play in the second. The south africans are arrogant, play obviously too dangerous and their tactic was to injure key lions players. now i see why the all blacks keep wining tri nations. The sa`s talent is not matched by good coaching and consistent playing. They are just like the dutch in football, too much talent and not so much cool heads during matches. The all blacks will win again this year and good for them.
Report this comment
by Jim July 6, 2009 10:43 GMT
I'll take a real victory over a moral victory anyday.
Report this comment
by Selwyn Price July 6, 2009 21:25 GMT
Say no more Jim, that probably sums up every SA weakness of the last 50 (or more) years.
Report this comment
by johannes Le Roux July 9, 2009 12:55 GMT
I cannot believe a coach will allow a team to lose a test match just to give everyone a chance to play. This is not primary school rugby were you give everyone a chance to play, you need to earn your way. This shows his level of coaching I think Pieter De Villiers need to grow up and take his job serially or get out. If he does not get his act together we are going to get killed in the Tri Nations. I vote to fire Pieter De Villiers!!!!! He sucks as a coach and is a disgrace to the springbok team and South Africa rugby. Can we please get someone professional to coach the South African team??
Report this comment


© Reuters