Tendai “Beast” Mtawarira

It has been interesting to watch the saga of Tendai “Beast” Mtawarira from afar.

It all seems rather strange that, having satisfied IRB residency regulations he then be left out of the Springboks at the behest of the politicians who then grant him citizenship so he can return to the team.

The end result is good, not just for South Africa, but for test rugby. Mtawarira is star quality, and had he no longer been eligible for South Africa he would have been lost to the highest level of the game because of the IRB regulations that stop a player from representing more than one country.

It did get me thinking about the issue of players appearing for a country other than that of their birth. After all, over the years New Zealand has been accused of “raping and pillaging” the playing stocks of the Pacific nations, notably Fiji and Samoa.

Much of the criticism of New Zealand has, I feel, been unjustified, or over the top.

It is true that there have been a number of Pacific born players in the black jersey, with three in the current squad being Jerome Kaino (American Samoa), Joe Rokocoko (Fiji) and Mils Muliaina (Samoa).

All three arrived in New Zealand with their families before they were of school age, part of a migration that began back in the 1960s, as people came looking for work and a good education for their children. The consequence of this is that Auckland is the biggest Polynesian city in the world, while more and more people are born and raised in New Zealand of families that are Samoan, Fijian, Tongan, Cook Island, Niue, or a mixture those and other races. They are New Zealanders, and they are Pacific Islanders, and their Pasifika is celebrated and very much part of the New Zealand cultural makeup.

Two of our most famous All Blacks, Michael Jones and Bryan Williams were born in New Zealand as a consequence of Samoan/European New Zealand marriages, while other Kiwi born Polynesian All Blacks include Tana Umaga, Ma’a Nonu, Andrew Blowers, Neemia Tialata, Keven Mealamu, Frank Bunce, Doug Howlett and Walter Little.

It is true that some players have been lured to New Zealand to play rugby, sometimes for provincial sides, but more often by Schools who have offered educational scholarships to players from the Pacific Islands who “just happen” to be good rugby players. Many of those have gone back to play for their country of birth, and many have stayed, but none that I know have yet gone on to be All Blacks.

Sitiveni Sivivatu is an interesting example. He came to school in New Zealand at 15, attending the famous Wesley College in South Auckland that produced Jonah Lomu. Until he came to NZ he was a soccer player, but at Wesley he switched to rugby and stayed on to play for Counties, the Chiefs and ultimately the All Blacks. It wasn’t until he was mentioned as an All Black candidate that Fiji rugby bosses even knew about him. By then Siti had his heart set on being an All Black, but at Fijis insistence the IRB ruled the years he had spent at Wesley were invalid as far as qualifying were concerned, and he had to sit out another three before he could play for New Zealand.

You could argue that, if anything, New Zealand has been more a benefactor than a beneficiary. For every one Pacific Islands born player who has represented New Zealand there are seven New Zealand born players who have played for another country.

At the 2003 Rugby World Cup 17 of the 30 strong Samoan team were New Zealand born, and others were New Zealand raised. No-one had any issue with that, and nor should they have.

The recent England team touring down under featured two Maori players, in Dan Ward Smith and Shontayne Hape, and would have featured a third if Riki Flutey had been fit. England, whose journalists have been the most scathing in their condemnation of New Zealand, have fielded a plethora of foreign born players over the years although they’ve got a way to go to match their cricket team. But unlike the Pacific Islanders in the All Blacks, and the Zimbabweans who have played for South Africa, many of these have been players who went to England simply to play professional sport. There’s a difference.

But I see no difference between Tendai Mtawarira, Bob Skinstad, Korne Crige, Tonderai Chavanga, Gary Teichmann and Adrian Garvey, and Sivivatu, Muliaina, Kaino, Jerry Collins, Rodney So’oialo and Joe Rokocoko....or Lote Tuqiri, Will Genia, Quade Cooper, Digby Ioane, Jeremy Paul, Clyde Rathbone and Dan Vickerman.

It’s the way of the world.

One thing that would be good, would be to loosen the IRB regulations so that a player who has represented a tier one country but is no longer in contention, is allowed to play for his country of origin if they are from a lower rung on the ladder.

One example would be Andrew Blowers, a New Zealand born player of Samoan heritage, who after being an All Black left to play overseas and later expressed a desire to play for Samoa, but was not allowed by the IRB.

Another would be Radike Samo, the Brumbies lock who was just about to play for his native Fiji when he was chosen for Australia, who then after a few tests, discarded him. He is lost to test rugby. Having represented Australia he should not be allowed to play for New Zealand, England or France, but what would be so terribly wrong with him playing for Fiji, or even Japan, where he has been playing club rugby.

The New Zealand Rugby Union tried to push through such a regulation change, but they were beaten, presumably because others saw some sinister intent in New Zealand actions, when there was none.

It’s a touchy issue, and I don’t expect you all to agree with what I’ve written, but I look forward to your comments.


Recent Blogs



Comments

by Patrick Andrews July 1, 2010 06:04 GMT
I agree! Great stuff, Tony
Report this comment
by Lionel Lambert July 1, 2010 06:32 GMT
when England meet SA on the cricket field, only the umpires are not Saffers:))
Report this comment
by Tim_67 July 1, 2010 11:59 GMT
I was just watching Boots and All and they kept going on about NZ having so many players from the Islands in their team. I wonder if they think NZ is all white or something. Do people not realize that NZ has one of the largest populations of Samoans in the world.
Report this comment
by Brendon Joseph July 1, 2010 15:18 GMT
Great article Tony - I totally agree with you.
Report this comment
by Jason Fell July 1, 2010 17:16 GMT
Thanks Tony. Great read as usual. I was wondering what your thoughts were about the Super 15 and whether it would have been beneficial to have a 'Pacific" based team instead of a fifth Australian team. Your article quite correctly lays out what is a mostly positive relationship for both NZ/SA/OZ rugby and also rugby stocks in smaller, less well developed rugby nations. But wouldn't it be great if things could change for the better at the grass roots level, instead of as some sort of symbiotic filching? Having a Super 15 team based around the Fijian, Samoan and Tongan island players would not have made a great deal of revenue. It would however have promoted the game, encouraged coaching and facilities to improve, and provided a real outlet for those nations' players to play top level rugby week in week out. Am I being to unrealistic or wishful to think that years of envious yet disadvantaged Pacific Island talent should eventually be rewarded in such a way?
Report this comment
by Len Green July 2, 2010 01:33 GMT
I was born in SA, I am eligible for British citizenship thru my father and I am now a US citizen. Which country could I play for/should I play for?
Report this comment
by michael whiteside July 2, 2010 02:54 GMT
Len depends on what's best for you! If by Sa you mean south africa then they are a great team but politics can affect selections for the team, playing for england would be ok but they are in a rut and are struggling to play fast pace rugby , usa are slowly getting better but not at the elite level yet.
Report this comment
by Brasileiro July 2, 2010 04:12 GMT
Thanks for that blog, Tony. I've had a running battle with my English friends and relatives who bring up the same ol' arguments you've talked about. Quite ironic now that they have few decent players to pick so are choosing the 3-year professionals. As to Len: my mother is South African, I was born in NZ but live in Brazil - for whom should I l play? Answer: none of them: I'm not good enough...
Report this comment
by Pdivvy July 4, 2010 01:48 GMT
I respect all your comments , but it intrigues that 1. The first issue of nationality in SA arises TJ dedicates his weekly blog to bring it up to justify a VERY grey area in NZ rugby . and 2. How many islanders were in the 40s , 50s , 60s ,70s teams ? If you claim to be such a harmonias bunch in the south pacific. Even in the semipro 80s when the islanders had pakeha(spelling) surnames .. williams , jones , brown etc. .....please re educate me because everytime I crack the joke about quota systems in NZ , that each team must have at least 4 white new zealanders in it.... I dont get many laughs from my kiwi mates.
Report this comment
by Rock Star July 4, 2010 16:42 GMT
I will play devils advacate to to the term where the likes of Blowers, Collins etc can play for their ethnic nations - If you were Ireland, Wales or Scotland who I believe were the nations that voted against this you would feel threatened by this potentially wruining their IRB ranking and the likes of Samoa, Fiji or Tonga doing well again in the next world cup boasted by player pool and selection. I think Fiji and Tonga went a long way in the previous world cup and the home nations would see this as a threat. I do see the positives to it and development to the smaller communities, however, can you image the whinges in the northern hemisphere when Jerry Collins scores the winning try over Wales or England for Samoa. In the southern hemisphere you would blame your team, however, in the north they have way of distracting attention away from poor performances and this would just give them another excuse.
Report this comment
by Rock Star July 4, 2010 16:52 GMT
Pdivvy, It is not a grey area in NZ rugby - I think TJ explains this well in his blog You will see more and more South African's playing for the All Blacks soon for some reason they are wanting to leave south africa at the rate of knots and live in NZ?? TJ, do you remember the story about WIllie Ofahengaue who played for New Zealand Schoolboys in 1988 and participated in a tour to Australia. However, on the return trip, he was refused re-entry to New Zealand with his Tongan passport so he moved to Australia and several test caps for the Wallabies. That is a great story by itself.
Report this comment
by David Keeley July 4, 2010 22:26 GMT
The seven Kiwis who play for other nations are either no longer AB caliber or never were. I don't have a problem with lesser Kiwis playing for weaker nations....as long as they have a passport. But poaching does occur. Australia poached Manuel Noriega from Argentina and SA poached the Beast from Zimbabwe. The IRB should be stricter about elgibility when the player is moving from a weaker nation to a stronger one.
Report this comment
by Anton du Preez July 5, 2010 14:00 GMT
I always enjoy your blogs and in this instance I agree with your comments regarding the IRB limitations regarding player choice. I would just like to point out two issues with the facts that you use to support your argument. It is interesting that you have to go back 17 years (Teich first played for the Boks in 93, Corne Krige in 99) to find sufficient names to compare with current NZ players. Another is that their countries of origin does not have a strong rugby presence while the Polynesian islands do. Both those facts strengthens the perceptions that AB rugby is leaning more on that base than their traditional base. Having said all that, I agree with you that it is the way of the world and suggest that the IRB should limit the playing restrictions to a time period. What is your opinion of a three year limit? What about a tournament where Barbarian type of games are played where players from smaller countries play European or Super 15 teams in those countries?
Report this comment
by Jacques Knotter July 5, 2010 14:00 GMT
I have always seen the All Blacks as the top Rugby players of the region in and around New Zealand.And the Springboks represented Southern Africa and not Just SA .Its like you wanted to be the best in your country hoping that you would be selected as a Springbok.(As the cherry on the cake).Its a pity its not like that anymore.
Report this comment
by GMC July 8, 2010 10:07 GMT
Nice article. But mentioning Clyde Rathbone and Dan Vickerman? They are both fully fledged South Africans who left the country in their twenties. I dont think that's quite the same as the others mentioned. They're in fact more along the lines of Flutey, Hape, and Vainikolo in England. The other questionable is the comparison of Zimbabwe or Zambia as rugby nations, compared with the Pacific Islands. It's not as if Zim would be a world beater if their players stayed there to play. But regardless, interesting piece and it will hopefully provide a little clarity for those wondering about the NZ & PI intermingling in rugby.
Report this comment
by Anton van der Merwe July 9, 2010 12:55 GMT
Mr Johnson, This is a bunch of NZ blow hard cr@p. What about the things you have not said? Please list all the PI's that where born abroad and player for NZ! Or was that an accidental oversight? Why do we never hear Zimbabwe or Zambian Rugby complaining about them being raped and pillaging by South Africa but the raping and pillaging of the PI is a constant complaint by these unions? Moreover, this paragraph of yours: "One thing that would be good, would be to loosen the IRB regulations so that a player who has represented a tier one country but is no longer in contention, is allowed to play for his country of origin if they are from a lower rung on the ladder." - is the most condescending piece of rugby journalism I have ever seen. Why does this subject have anything to do with where a country is on the ladder. In these words you reveal exactly the real issue here. Your argument is about NZ's ability to use and abuse PI's as NZ see fit (because you are higher up on the ladder) and then discard them! Shameful. You are nobody's God, Sir! I think changing the IRB regs is a very good idea. Make it 5 tests. If a player haven't played more than 5 tests for a country he can play for another country. This will stop NZ from producing 1 test All Blacks just so they can't play for another country. Mr Johnson, maybe you would like to list the names of 1 test All Blacks over the last decade... But then again, that might be asking for too much - you do strike me as a typical NZer.
Report this comment
by Ashley Morton July 9, 2010 19:41 GMT
I think that one of the most challenging things in the world is the definition of "tiers" of nations. Some are clear, but some are most definitely NOT. If membership in "tier one" is defined as playing in the 6 nations or the tri nations, then Argentina was not Yyeta tier one nation, though it was 3rd at the last world cup. Similarly, none of the pacific island nations are tier one, yet Italy is? Even if we take the weakest (Italy) off the list, Scotland no longer seems in a separate class from the Pacific islands - and they aren't in a separate class from Canada/USA/Japan/Georgia/Romania/Russia/Namibia, and those ones aren't in a separate class from Portugal/Spain/Tunisia - and those ones aren't in a separate class from ... etc, Even if you can take issue with some of my "not in a separate class" distinctions, I think that we can all admit that teams weaken and strengthen, and thus cross these lines. Fiji at it's best can beat a weak Scotland. Japan at its best can beat a weak Fiji. And so on... Therefore, how do you set up rules that divide the rugby world into tiers? Interestingly, I refereed Sweden-Croatia recently, and it was clear that both teams had a notable, relevant fraction of their squad who couldn't speak either Swedish or Croatian - some were fresh off the Auckland-Hong Kong-Frankfurt-Stockholm connection, while others had made the relatively quick London-Stockholm flight. Apparently the London Scottish seconds have players from four or five different national teams, some of whom have never set foot in the land of their grandparents...
Report this comment
by rhys jones July 9, 2010 20:31 GMT
Anton van der Merwe - I am guessing by your name that you might be what? A south african. Unusual for a name like yours to be associated with some bigotry! Please keep the insults to yourself. I am an immigrant myself - one thing I have learnt living in different countries and cultures for the last 11 years is one thing - never be quick to judge others. Tony wrote a great article as usual, and provides information for great debate! Requiring him to list every single player that YOU deem necessary seems beyond ridiculous. Tony definitely left some questions to be answered with some of his statements.....nice work tony, very enjoyable
Report this comment
by Jon-Erik Nissen July 9, 2010 23:03 GMT
Some very good thoughts here. If a player no longer under consideration for, say, a New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, etc., wanted to play for the country of his birth, why not? I would stop short of letting that person play anywhere he chose, but the chance to represent a country that is his heritage should be considered.
Report this comment
by Greg Stewart July 10, 2010 15:20 GMT
Living in USA, it is disheartening to hear the American commentators refer to the Boks vs All Blacks clash as "the fast cultured rugby against the big dumb rugby"...... the unfortunate part about it is that it is true. Muir is coaching this team the way he coached the Lions..... kick "up and unders" onto the best full-back in the world, and see if he runs holes thru us !!!! HELLO guys what are you thinking, or are you doing the "stupid coach" bit as well???. Not to mention Januarie, who I always assumed just played slowly from the ruck.... but that is not it... he THINKS slowly from the ruck, which is worse.... anyway, they got what they deserved...and it will be repeated next week as well......THUMPED
Report this comment
by Selwyn Price July 12, 2010 12:41 GMT
A thoughtful column and generally thoughtful comments, as is frequently encountered when people put their prejudices away. However, I must point out to Anton van der Merwe that there is no such thing as a "typical NZer" anymore than there is a typical Saffa, or a typical Pom, or any other nationality, and it is this thinking that continues to impinge on the development of the game in SA. IRB regulations insist on a three-year residency period, yet the vast majority of "PI" players who have chosen to represent NZ have lived there most or all of their lives, and sometimes go back several generations. Your apparent umbrage at the article sadly says more about you and your indefensible thinking than it does about Tony Johnson's observations - he certainly does not believe he is anybody's God.
Report this comment
by Anton van der Merwe July 14, 2010 00:47 GMT
@ Rhys Jones You can guess all you want buddy and you will be wrong. I am a citizen of a country in the Northern Hemisphere - duhhhh! If someone insults the readership on this website with the drivel Mr Johnson put out in this case he should expect to be insulted. Me asking him to list the names of foreign born NZ players is ridiculous? He took great pains to list AUS and SA foreign born players but conveniently skipped out on listing the NZ ones. But wait, maybe I was being ridiculous: this blog page is too small for all those names! What was I thinking...
Report this comment
by Anton van der Merwe July 14, 2010 00:56 GMT
@ Selvyn Price You might want to rethink your post there buddy! So your point is that Mr Johnson's article was complete nonsense because you state "the vast majority of "PI" players who have chosen to represent NZ have lived there most or all of their lives, and sometimes go back several generations." OK, so what was the point of Mr Johnson's article then? His article by its very nature admits to the raping and pillaging of the PIs - why else would there be a need to allow the PI CITIZENS!! to play for their country of birth. Goodness gracious Selvyn what did you smoke for breakfast? You might want to consider rearranging those logic brain cells a bit. By the way, if NZ is sooooo concerned about the PIs and their ability to do well against other 'inferior' unions (some in the UK) they should stop raping and pillaging the islands and give the PIs the best shot they can possibly have.
Report this comment
by Brendon Joseph July 14, 2010 01:54 GMT
Anton (Van Der Merwe) - being a journalist and TV presenter is not easy and its unfair to get personal with Tony when he cannot answer your insults back without getting into trouble. I agree with the other guys in that there is no such thing as a typical New Zealander ir typical any nation. I feel Tony posted a great article which highlighted some stuff which we overlooked and made total sense when I read it. After reading it an being educated it actually made our own Boots 'n All folks look ignorant and disrespectful to the New Zealanders if anything when watching "our show" and the folks went on about Island players vs "local guys". Quite honestly its a global world now and anyone should be able to represent any country as long as they live there and meet residential qualifications much like representing a Province. For example if Frans Steyn was to get the cold shoulder for years to come, why coul dhe not turn out for France if lets say he married a French woman, had French kids and lived there? We also have ALL to be dead honest with ourselves. Are we really uptight that one country takes players from another or are we simply insecure or jealous that our rivals have access to other pools which could make them stronger?
Report this comment
by Anton van der Merwe July 14, 2010 13:42 GMT
Dear Brendon - The reality of the internet (and blogs like this) is that everyone is now in a sense a "journalist". No one should expect to post stuff - like Mr Johnson did - and not get asked to validate his claims or be at least even handed. The days of THE PRESS telling everyone what is true and what is not is over. Newspapers are dieing. So, if there are no stereotypes, what is the "typical Saffa" that Selvyn referred to in his post? So all is nice and good now with the fluid global rugby market place? So unbridled poaching of other countries' under aged players is just fine and dandy. Someone should tell SARU that because recently when the Crusaders targeted certain high schools in SA with a "rugby academy" scam, SARU accosted the NZRU for even trying that! NZRU and the Crusaders backed off. HHmmmm, wonder what the principle was behind that. Sadly, the PIs don't have that kind of clout... By the way, what is your rational for why Mr Johnson took pains in listing SA and AUS foreign born players but only chose to list players of PI heritage born in NZ? Gaping hole in his "I'll tell you what the truth is" article, it seems to me...
Report this comment
by Selwyn Price July 14, 2010 15:18 GMT
@ Anton - sadly I didn't smoke anything for breakfast, but I wish I had been able to share some of yours with you. If you'd care to re-read what I wrote you may have a better understanding of the points being made here.
Report this comment
by Anton van der Merwe July 14, 2010 15:58 GMT
Dear Selvyn - sad indeed if you consider yourself bright-eyed and bushy tailed (unimpeded by any substance) yet swallowed Mr Johnson's holier-then-thou drivel without blinking an eye.
Report this comment
by Justin Parkinson July 20, 2010 22:06 GMT
Mr van der Merwer, "Please list all the PI's that where born abroad and player for NZ!" And while you're at it, list the date they played, the date they moved to NZ, and their birth dates.
Report this comment
by Matthew Toon July 21, 2010 19:46 GMT
I think alot of people don't understand the nature of Immigration from the PI's into NZ. NZ considers itself a Pacific island itself with cultural and historical ties to many of the other Pacific islands therefore relatively large numbers of Pacific Islanders have taken advantage of Immingration laws to move to NZ in order to provide opportunities for there families in a bigger economy. NZ is not in the business of forcing people to immigrate here. The vast majority of foriegn born All Blacks came here at a very young age ie Mills Muliaini who was 2 or 3 he knows no other country as his own and it is not surprising that when he grew up he would want to play for the All Blacks. It would also surprise many people that NZ's population of Pacific Islanders is roughly equal to that of the combined populations of Tonga and Samoa there are alot of PI people who call NZ home shouldn't some of them be able to play for there country? surely they can otherwise if you follow the arguement that they can't to it's absurd conclusion only Native Black South Africans should be picked for SA which of course is absurd!!
Report this comment