Rugby bosses get it right

We are quick to criticise rugby bosses when they get things wrong, so let’s give credit where it’s due.

As well as implementing some bold and effective ways that are making the game more attractive to watch and easier to understand, referee bosses are also living up to their stated intention of demanding higher standards from their own.

The decision to stand Paul Marks down indefinitely from Super 14 duty will not have been taken lightly.

Not for a minute do I think Paul Marks is a cheat. Having met him a few times I would say he is a pretty decent fellow, trying hard to be a good referee, but one who seems to battle under extreme pressure and has consequently made some big mistakes at key moments.

We had a good look at his performance on Reunion this week, and in doing so drew the following conclusions on the three biggest calls.

1) There was absolutely nothing wrong with Ryan Kankowskis try from the lineout. It was a brilliant piece of timing and anticipation. It may have looked suspect, and Phil Kearns certainly thought so, but after watching on replay Rod Kafer endorsed Marks decision. So a brilliant try and a pretty good piece of reffing.

2) Marks should have awarded a penalty try late in the game. You will never convince me Kurtley Beale was trying for an intercept and Kankowski probably would have scored had the pass found its target. As in Wellington two years ago, Marks showed a lack of conviction under pressure. This time it cost the Sharks.

3) As for the lineout obstruction late in the game (which we didn’t talk about on ReUnion, but which I looked at in the context of the game). Well, he made absolutely the right call. The lifters stepped in behind the jumper and that is something the refs have been told to crack down on. Trouble was it had been going on all game and he’d done nothing about it, so to suddenly penalise the Sharks at such a crucial time was badly inconsistent.

So for that, and other reasons no doubt, he has been stood down. So too, has Pro Legoete regardless of how Andre Watson wants to sugar coat it. Pro gave one of the strangest calls I have ever seen when he ruled an accidental off-side against the Cheetahs when Juan Smith, by “pre-binding” onto the ball carrier was guilty of blatant obstruction.

And don’t forget New Zealander Josh Noonan was stood for a week from flag waving duties after a bad touchline call in the Crusaders Highlanders game.

My info is that Steve Walsh was also under some consideration, but has been given the benefit of the doubt, having admitted he made a mistake in awarding the Brumbies a penalty try against the Lions. The Lions were guilty of repeat infringements, but instead of going to the posts, Walsh should have kept going for his pocket...or should that be his sock, where for some strange reason he keeps his cards.

We don’t want witch hunts but we do want accountability, and we are starting to get it, although there still seems to be a degree of immunity for the top tier, and that has to change.

And finally, enough of this rubbish about Walsh winking at the Brumbies. As we have seen from TMO calls, freeze frames are often misleading, and this claim is the work of conspiracy theorists.

I happen to have known Walsh for a long time, since before he became a prominent ref. At his best he is world class, but his career has been hampered by personal issues.

Despite being urged not to, he used alcohol to try and deal with the pressures of the job and clearly that is a recipe for trouble. Rather than be ridiculed, he should be commended for admitting his problems so publically, getting over his drinking issues and rebuilding his career. He is not a cheat, either, but I do think he was guilty of losing his rag with the Lions, and made a bad call.

He will be on notice this weekend and he knows that.

Just to cap the week, we’ve had two Highlanders stood down for breaking curfew.

It seems they didn’t get into any trouble, they just stayed out past the time agreed to by the team, and have been censured by protocols they would have been part of establishing.

One of the reasons teams have such rules is to help them stay out of the sort of trouble that will inevitably find high profile rugby players late at night.

Ask Sione Lauaki, whose career is on thin ice after a late night incident in Hamilton.

Hopefully next week we will be talking about the rugby, but in the meantime, just for your amusement here are my picks, having got a barely acceptable 4 out of 6 last week.

Crusaders to edge the Chiefs. Could be spectacular.
Waratahs to beat the Lions, may not be pretty.
Brumbies to hold off a fired up Sharks. Expect more controversy.
Bulls to run rough shod over Highlanders.
Stormers, just, over Hurricanes, but don’t be surprised if it goes the other way.
Reds to beat Force. Worth a watch because they don’t like each other much.


Recent Blogs



Comments

by Flying Wing March 12, 2010 16:20 GMT
Amen TJ! It is great to finally see some accountability being dished out to out referees. As for Mr. Walsh: I also agree that there is no way that he has ever been a cheat and that he should be commended for dealing with his personal issues. However, this was not the first time that he has been known to "loose his rag" at a team and based on the evidence it will probably not be the last time. A good referee should be able to stay calm regardless of the pressures (of course this is easy to say from the safety of my armchair at home). Look at how well Mark Lawrence did this weekend. Sure, some small mistakes, but always confident and communicating brilliantly with the players (who showed up with great attitudes), which in turn helped produce a great game. Great stuff!
Report this comment
by Pdivvy March 14, 2010 05:54 GMT
Lawrence is good ref. But he shouldnt have got physically involved in scuffle with Cowan and Burgur. Burgur then lashed out and 'manhandled' the ref.(he said he thought it was a highlander but if you see replay thats BS coz Burgur was looking at the ref before it happened) Lawrence then decided not to take the matter furthur with regards to citings etc. Charges were dropped. Same country bias. Doubt that wouldve been the case if it were Kiwi or Oz ref.Another call for neutral refs
Report this comment
by Rock Star March 14, 2010 12:58 GMT
100% this week TJ- my work mates owe me this week. Cheers
Report this comment
by Sam Glazer March 14, 2010 15:45 GMT
Tony, sanctioning referees will make little difference to improving the reliability of results. The weakness is not so much in referee performances as it is in the system of refereeing. No single person can cover the territory referees are expected to cover. It's virtually impossible. This is why reliable refereeing is the exception, not the norm. We'll be here next year, and the next, and the next, complaining about the officiating, with good reason. This is a decades old weakness that has only marginally been improved over a very long period of time. Officiating must be spread to more than one person. Teams should be given two or three appeals per game, a second referee should be put on the field, and the linesmen given the power to flag offsides. Sanctioning of referees will make little difference. The IRB continues to drop-the-ball here, and are moving at snails pace. It cannot rely on referees to disavow themselves of the drunken power they currently hold, even though it is hurting them. The IRB executive has to do it. Will they, and when?
Report this comment
by Sam Glazer March 14, 2010 15:55 GMT
It's appalling how unreliable rugby results are. It's appalling how the IRB continues to allow this, in a billion dollar sport, watched and played by millions of people.
Report this comment
by Flying Wing March 14, 2010 21:54 GMT
What a difference it makes when a referee knows that he is on notice. MUCH better officiating from Steve Walsh. Not perfect, but much better. Seemed a lot cooler under the pressure too. My only criticism would be that he allowed much more hands in the rucks than the other officials. Both the Stormers and Highlanders got away with it. All in all, I really enjoy seeing how different teams are coming up with different solutions as to how to deal with the rucks. This year really is coming up with class A entertainment. Love it. Thanks for the article TJ!
Report this comment
by Alfred Thomas March 15, 2010 02:47 GMT
BAD article TJ, first of all you must be keeping one eye open and the other one closed. This is probably some of the most one side opinionated articles you have ever written, usually you get it right, but not this time. Why you ask. Because you are trying to defend bad refereeing from NZ refs, and blowing the others away. Not being biased myself have and from Canada I have seen that the SA refs were getting it right more often than not, and the rest were not up to it at all, including the NZ refs.
Report this comment
by JV March 18, 2010 15:34 GMT
Great piece, as usual. But I'm not sure what Alfred Thomas is referring to - the only referee mentioned with any association to NZ is Steve Walsh, and he is now officially an Australian... I suspect Alfred was maybe reading this piece "keeping one eye open and the other one closed"? Geez.
Report this comment