The Six Nations Championship trumps the Tri-Nations

Which would you rather have, rugby fans – the Tri-Nations or the Six Nations ? Yes, I know, the Tri-Nations is a stronger competition in that its sides are routinely one, two and three in the world rankings. It’s hard, fierce and unrelenting. It can be innovative and exciting, too, with Super 14 players more inclined to take risk. But its format is tired, which is why it will be a great boost for all concerned when Argentina finally gets to join the big boys.

Three teams, three top teams, no less, is all very well but how often can you play each other in any one season without the eyelids beginning to droop and the snores beginning to rumble ? Home and away, and then home again. Or is it the other way around ? What’s more, it’s the same cast of characters that have been on parade through the three months of Super rugby. Same style, same temperament, same strengths and weaknesses. Good players, of course, but the same players. Todd Blackadder once told me that he relished playing in the Heineken Cup when he was at Edinburgh because he didn’t know what he was going to come up with from one week to the next. There was a whole mix of types of rugby on offer, a different menu of climate too from the frozen, dreak and dreary north to the sunny uplands of southern France.

But, for me, the thing that clinches it when elevating the Six Nations over the Tri-Nations is the fans. There are lots of them on the road, in Dublin, in Paris, in Rome or wherever. The great capital cities of Europe are thronged with the colours and noises not only of home supporters but, more importantly, of away fans. There have been great tales told for many decades of Welsh expeditions to Edinburgh. Even Graham Henry admitted to being stunned by the level of support in the first year that he took the Wales side north of the border. Drawing the hotel curtains back on the Saturday of the match, Henry looked down Princes Street to see but a sea of red.

You can transfer that scene to any of the venues. Rome has become a wonderful addition to the circuit. The Italians may be taking their time to get into rugby, although 80,000 at the San Siro in Milan to see the game against the All Blacks in November is an encouraging indicator of things to come, but away fans flock to the Eternal City, often scoring brownie points with wife, girlfriend ( or both ) in tow.

It’s not just good for the local tourist board that so many make the trip. It adds to the occasion, creates a sense of tribalism that will endure no matter what. That pressure, that sense of meeting the expectations of travelling fans, many of whom have forked out at great expense, adds to the pressure on players. That can only be a good thing. Twickenham celebrates its centenary this weekend. The place was packed 100 years ago as England surprisingly beat much-fancied Wales, 11-6. The stadium will be packed again on Saturday. Same backdrop. Same result ? That’s up for grabs. What is certain, though, is that the Six Nations championship has lost none of its appeal.

If you want to read more of Mick Cleary go to www.telegraph.co.uk


Recent Blogs



Comments

by Yuval Diga February 2, 2010 16:35 GMT
Don't usually agree with Mick's jaundiced views of southern footy but he has hit the nail on the head here. The Trinations, while it is a much higher standard of football and more entertaining in terms of styles, particularly when Oz and NZ are playing each other, has got very old. The crowds in Oz and NZ have responded by staying home, with the previously unthinkable sight of empty seats at some Tri games in recent years. Doesn't help when rule reversions mean that SA can kick their way to a title through the stupendous boot of Mr Steyn - being a bit mean here Boks did deserve it but hell they're one dimensional. That said, i have to say the thought of watching Italy's pack trying to murder rugby one more time hardly fills me with anticipation.
Report this comment
by Nicholas Hunter February 3, 2010 01:37 GMT
Fair enough.
Report this comment
by ron simmonds February 3, 2010 15:58 GMT
Yes, turnouts in N.Z. for rugby have been pretty lame especially for Super 14 & AirNZ Cup. I started going to internationals when i was 10 years old. I was there at Eden Park for the 4th test between the ABs & Boks - 65,000 people. What a sight and what a feeling. In those days they allowed school kids to sit in the inner-ground on the grass. There was no TV in those days. Big games at all levels started at 3pm. I say abolish the early evening games - who the hell wants to sit in the pouring rain on a cold winters nite in N.Z. - catch it on the telly. Tho internationals sell out i think regional blackouts might be in order for Super 14 & provincial rugby. The inclusion of Argentine is good for Super 14 tho i do think i'd rather see them in Tri-Nations & better still add a Fijian side or a combined Pacific Islands side. It is high time that the IRB enforces the ABs & Oz to drop off for a game or two in the US or Canada whilst on their way to the north. A full strength AB side has not played in Canada for at least 30 yrs. Yes you cannot escape the tradition & trappings of 6Nations but I'd have southern rugby anytime over Heineken Rugby
Report this comment
by ron simmonds February 3, 2010 16:00 GMT
That should read "I was there at Eden Park in 1956 for....."
Report this comment
by Addi February 3, 2010 18:18 GMT
I'd like to watch the 6N but unfortunately RZ don't broadcast :(
Report this comment
by Guy Robert February 3, 2010 18:27 GMT
Addi---6N rights are owned by Premium Sports. They are offering the tournament at $20 US per match or $100 US for the tournament. How badly do you want to watch? Don't know where you are, but in the U.S. BBC America is going to show one match per week on "free" TV.
Report this comment
by Guy Robert February 3, 2010 18:41 GMT
Mick, I totally agree with your analysis. The 6 Nations is way more fun to watch. In the end, it's all down to geography.
Report this comment
by cw barnett February 3, 2010 19:06 GMT
Readers: Be careful with the Premium Sports option. My understanding is that they will only carry Six Nations rugby until the end of February. They get the feed from Setanta and Fox Sports has acquired Setanta's rights effective 1 March 2010 so you'll only get the February matches. All too bad for me; it looks like I won't be seeing any Six Nations rugby this year. I'm glad the last two seasons have been so compelling. I'll miss it. CW Barnett Kensington, Connecticut
Report this comment
by Jason Fell February 3, 2010 19:26 GMT
CW - If you get BBC America on cable there is one live match a week of the six nations starting this saturday at 12pm ET. Perhaps if we all watch it they will get more for us!
Report this comment
by Guy Robert February 3, 2010 21:00 GMT
CW--Fox only bought "selected" rugby rights. I don't believe 6 Nations was among them. In fact, Fox has yet to say anything about its acquired rugby rights which leads me to believe they are sub-leasing them. Premium Sports is offering the whole package, but I find their pricing ridiculous.
Report this comment
by invictus February 4, 2010 08:58 GMT
There's only one game in Rugby worth watching ... .All Blacks v Springboks . Always has been ....Always will be ( With a Lions tour every 4 yrs just to add a bit of colour)
Report this comment
by ron simmonds February 5, 2010 04:56 GMT
Setanta is showing this weekend 2009 6Nations LOL. but are showing in both Canada & USA IRBs from Hamilton (sic). Thats Setanta - don't know there Dick from their arse. On in 3 hrs & i'll be watching but from Wellington. Last year Setanta showed 6 Nations on a delayed basis - correct me if i'm wrong. This time next week is what matters - eh JAY. If in Canada TV5 maybe showing French game live - In Lotusland thats Sunday @ 7am PST on Shaw Ch 124
Report this comment
by Robert Pieterse February 8, 2010 12:37 GMT
First round of 6nations was very boring, to much kicking, not enough running rugby. SA NZ and OZ all have the skilled players to run the ball from there own line. It dosent matter how may times they play eachother in the Tri-nations, as long as its great rugby to watch. 6nations they play eachother once, and how many of the games will be worth watching if you want to see running rugby. France vs Wales would be the only game.
Report this comment
by ron simmonds February 8, 2010 21:05 GMT
I agree on all counts Robert. Poss. the excuse of "rustiness" could be brought up but in reality most of these guys were playing together back in November. I watched France/Scotland live and the other two games in bits & pieces - Super Bowl which i don't normally watch was on. I'm tired of the pick and go, tired of fake injuries (english & french) and the "seagulls" floating around rucks obstructing. Its Albany at at 6.35am GMT on Friday for me - Gonna have to fit in IRB 7s as well. What a feast.
Report this comment
by Rob Russell_78 February 9, 2010 02:10 GMT
If I was a northern hemisphere supporter I too would just watch the fans, it's a bit more it's a bit more exciting than the northern hemisphere rugby!
Report this comment
by AmeriTAH February 9, 2010 05:04 GMT
If you want to watch crowds, go to the beach. If you want to watch rugby, go to SANZAR.
Report this comment
by ron simmonds February 10, 2010 06:41 GMT
Amen
Report this comment
by Nils theLatvian February 10, 2010 09:30 GMT
In terms of fan (especially travelling) support 6N wins hands down - mainly thanks to VERY SHORT TRAVELLING DISTANCE. However, I doubt you'll ever see in 3N such a dull games like Ireland vs Italy last week or a plenty of simply dreadful games of recent 6N tournaments, involving the likes of England, Italy and Scotland.
Report this comment
by Joe Bartell February 10, 2010 11:20 GMT
6N= a nasty pile of bodies called a ruck followed by a pitiful kick or 2 haphazard passes leading to a knock-on- repeat ad nauseum. Give me Tri-Nations any day. Add in Argentina and Figi or whatever you will but give me a wide open game played with skill and speed. (Once the global economy recovers I'll bet the stands see more butts- RWC won't hurt either) I'm seriously considering emigrating to NZ just for the Rugby!
Report this comment
by Michael Staab February 11, 2010 19:18 GMT
joe... you obviously did not watch last years tri nations.... SA could not score a try for the life of them and kicked kicked followed by some more kicking. I'm getting bored with the trination to be honest. it was great when it was just two matches (one home, one away) but now three... Can't wait for Argentina to join... bring on samoa and fiji too... make a southern 6 nations. Not that would be far more entertaining than either the current six nations or the current tri nations. Love the super 14, but don't want to see Aus, NZ and SA play each other countless times every year. It is getting boring and lacking originality.
Report this comment
by G Trotter February 12, 2010 00:18 GMT
how could you possibly compare the tri nations to the 6N until the northern Hemisphere teams can compete on a regular basis with southern hemisphere teams they will always be a second string competion to the Tri nations.Most of all the test matches are sold out in NZ and aussie and SA when the play each other , and most aren,t when the northern teams tour because they play boring rugby and who really wants to waste there money watching them get beaten 9 times out of 10 when they can watch it on TV.It would be great to see a combined pacific team in the competion at least they play entertaining rugby which people would pay to see ,thats why the public pay to watch the sevens because of the pacific island teams and they way they play and i,m sure they would in the 15,s aswell
Report this comment