Too much for too few

The Springboks being shoved around by Italy, the Wallabies going down to Scotland for the first time in 27 years! ... what’s gone wrong with this game?

I suppose one should be applauding Italy’s improvement and lauding the Scots for gutsing it out but I think what we’ve seen from these summer Tests (summer for us, winter for them) is proof that the structure that has evolved in professional rugby is just wrong.

There’s way too much rugby and you can see it in the type of game that is being played.

Most teams seem to have settled on a plan of kicking the ball to kingdom come, rushing up and waiting for their opponents to make a mistake.

When you get both teams doing it you end up with the kind of game England and New Zealand dished up at Twickenham. I don’t know about you but I wouldn’t cross the road to watch that rubbish; never mind pay to do it!

A situation has been created in which you can almost see the players going through the motions. Their hearts are not in it, there’s little passion (other than from the French when they took the Boks on at their own game and belted them) and the message is loud and clear – oh hell, not another game… but at least it’s a pay-day.

There’s talk of hitting the players in the back pocket with a bonuses for wins and penalties for defeats but that might be treating the symptom rather than the cause.

The game is now run by administrators who don’t respect tradition and whose only solution is to arrange another game. So the rich look after the rich and the minnows are left to flee from the sharks and the upshot is that too many Test matches have been rendered meaningless.

The only reason for the Wallabies, the Springboks and the All Blacks to be overseas at the moment is revenue because their tours aren’t doing much for the integrity of the game. In fact Australia might not have been on a Grand Slam tour had Fiji not agreed to forego their Twickenham Test in return for one in Australia!

And while on that subject, what’s really being done for the islands – Tonga, Fiji and Samoa? Their players are spread around the world, they always have to play without the benefit of any warm-ups and, because of the financial considerations, they seldom get to play at home.

Yet they possess players who have an incredible love of the game – who’ll do anything just to play. So why not, for the next World Cup, cancel all the tournaments and arrange for all the nations to have some hit-outs before the World Cup starts and then see how they go?

Test matches have to mean something and administrators and the so-called marketers who think it is they, and not the players, who fill stadiums have created a situation where to play for your country is not that big a deal any more.

And the reason is that we play too much to give it any deep meaning and, just in case you thought I’d miss beating my drum one more time!, the rules have got to change to engender a more entertaining game.


Recent Blogs



Comments

by Pdivvy November 23, 2009 09:51 GMT
Too much rugby. Totally with you there. But the IRB heirachy just think the bottom line. They dont seem to listen to anyone except themselves and sit and stroke eachothers egos in their private clubs. They are making decisions regardless of what their electorate thinks and are incompetent to the point that it is shockingly evident they made a mix up with their short list of IRB player of the year by including Francois Steyn (who apart from theose kicks in Hamilton , had an average season) instead of Morne Steyn who won a series and broke personal records in the Tri Nations. They were probably drunk on vintage whiskey when they released the list
Report this comment
by Skip November 23, 2009 14:09 GMT
the fair contest sought at breakdown has lead to kick fests as being caught in your own half means a good chance of giving away a penalty. This weekend a bunch of us went to a bar specifically to watch the games and all of, die hard fans of the game hated it. Trouble is we have more to look forward to as they IRB have said no more rule changes for 2 years. So kick the leather off it, wait for an error, stuff it up your jumped and maula way, either scoring a milking a penalty. The rugby football league must be wondering why they aren't the global version of the game.
Report this comment
by Eugene ?? November 23, 2009 16:11 GMT
Good one Campo, agree with everything you've said here.
Report this comment
by Pdivvy November 23, 2009 17:33 GMT
Off the topic...Gotta love PdV. When those w@nk#r British and Irish gutter press, the ones that spoilt a good Lions series with all their lies and bitching, tried to bait him at press conference about comments in John Smits new book about the Lions declining to have beers after the games(which is true) and that there is bad blood between the Boks and Irish, he promptly retorted " No problem , maybe they dont like South African Beer !!!!" This comes a close second to his response to the New Zealanders whose noses were out of joint about not staying in Hamiliton before the test he said "What am I gonna do with them , take them to the zoo everyday !!!" PdV you learning my man and you you turning the tables on the media making them look like the twats they really they are !!! When are those media weasels gonna learn PdV lives in PdV land and gives a flying f*@ck about what you runts write about him.
Report this comment
by Peter November 24, 2009 02:34 GMT
It's sad when the rules of a sport are such that having posession of the ball is often more of a disadvantage than an advantage. Actually having the ball and trying to play rugby (true rugby) most often results in peanalties at the breakdown or handling errors. Any handling errors now result in the dreaded scrum which sumply sucks time out of the match and usually results in an infraction (that nobody can figure out). Game flow is diminished, running rugby is too risky and the result is a lesser form of the sport.
Report this comment
by Peter November 24, 2009 02:34 GMT
It's sad when the rules of a sport are such that having posession of the ball is often more of a disadvantage than an advantage. Actually having the ball and trying to play rugby (true rugby) most often results in peanalties at the breakdown or handling errors. Any handling errors now result in the dreaded scrum which sumply sucks time out of the match and usually results in an infraction (that nobody can figure out). Game flow is diminished, running rugby is too risky and the result is a lesser form of the sport.
Report this comment
by Alex Chang November 24, 2009 09:39 GMT
Bring back the short arm ELV'S! Less risk of penalties with the ball in hand means taking more risks with the ball in hand! The Tri - Nation tests with the short arm sanctions were fantastic games and spectacles. We saw great contests and most importantly running rugby. It about time the IRB started to look after the people paying to watch the game!
Report this comment
by william green November 24, 2009 11:33 GMT
David, as much as I hate too admit it, I think you finally got it right especially for the ABs and Springboks. Just look at Victor Matfield and others who have played and won the super 14, the B&I series, tri-nations, Currie cup and now this tour. The problem is not that there is too much tests matches, there are too many competitions in one season. The Wallabies have no excuses David, they dont have a domestic season and therefor should be the most well rested of the lot and should be showing the most spark. However, I hate to be negative without offering a solution, which I think should be in the form of a player capping system, whereby the number of non-test matches that a test player is allowed to play, gets capped in order to save the player from too much rugby. Say if test players are only allowed 80% of non-test games, that might help towards keeping players fresh. What do you think?
Report this comment
by John Norton November 24, 2009 12:09 GMT
Spot on I dont always agree with Campese but in this case rugby is going the same way as cricket, one meaningless tournament after another. Rugby test matches were titanic affairs played between countries. Test matches were huge occasions with everything at stake, now we have TV companies telling us when to watch e.g Springboks vs France @ 9.45pm at night, referees who cant referee and huge number of injuries!
Report this comment
by pieter verschaeve November 24, 2009 18:05 GMT
im sorry campo but its not a NH problem, we have one big European competition for all pro teams, and every country has its league, but you guys have an provincial and a super 14 competition and thats where the problem is instead of just having one compitition you have two where the pay isnt bad but guys need to play in the super 14 aswell if they want to get any decent amount of money, the england-nz game is a perfect example, NZ looked very unsharp and not willing to put they're body on the line whilst eng who are in a mess right now gave a very gutsy performance filled with passion and took NZ to the wire. exactly the same with aus-scotl. so MAN UP AND ADMIT THAT THE PROBLEM IS IN THE NH WITH FAR TO MANY GAMES FOR THEY'RE OWN GOOD!
Report this comment
by Brian Jardine November 25, 2009 02:36 GMT
You nailed it, Campo! But, do you think this is going to continue? Do you think rugby can ever go back to big, meaningful, heart-pounding test matches?
Report this comment
by Brian Jardine November 25, 2009 02:39 GMT
oh, and... Jay, that was the funniest little side note on PdV. ROFL!
Report this comment
by Brian Jardine November 25, 2009 02:48 GMT
Sorry, 3 comments in a row is annoying. I just had to add that I recently tried to explain the game of rugby to my American friends. It went a bit like this. 2 teams on opposite ends try to score points against each other in a physical encounter by scoring a try, kicking conversion, penalties, and/or drop kicks. When a team has the ball, they run at the opposition and get tackled. When they are tackled, they try and keep the ball. But, inevitably the ref blows for the defending team. So, the team with the ball decides to kick the ball up in the air a lot...not too far...just so far enough they can run forward and tackle the receiver so the ref can blow the whistle again. Then, when the game stops, there is a scrum. Only the people in the scrum know what's going on. So, when the scrum goes down too many times, the ref just gives a penalty to one of the two teams. Usually, nowadays, the team that tackles the most wins the game. There aren't too many tries, because it's a lot easier to just kick the ball around a lot. What's that? No, it's not like soccer. Wait. Damnit, it is soccer.
Report this comment
by Phillip Britz November 25, 2009 11:06 GMT
Campo I agree with you 100% that there is WAY too much rugby being played. My entire life revolves around rugby and I've often joked that I only work to earn a salary so I can eat and watch rugby on weekends! BUT even so I think I would appreciate it more if the rugby season was less demanding on our players. I think ultimately it would provide for a better spectacle as far less world class players would be off injured for months at a time. I do disagree that rugby has gotten boring. Trust me if you're a Bok supporter you're finding rugby VERY exciting at the moment. Its when your team runs around for 80min, scores 1 try and often loses the match that rugby becomes boring. I guess I would also complain about boring rugby if I supported the Wallabies though!
Report this comment
by Aisea T. Tuikolovatu November 25, 2009 19:29 GMT
Great points Campo!! The game is getting really boring now. It reminds me of what a friend told me about watching soccer/football game, ("you can watch the grass grow") Also the IRB has not done enough for Tonga, Fiji, & Samoa. They haven't done anything to make playing for your country becomes attractive enough to even think twice about. Just take a look at the All Blacks, Wallabies, US Eagles, and Japan. They are filled with Pacific Island players and the sad thing about it, when those nations are done with them, done are done with international period. Right now Fiji can use Joe Rokococo if the ABs are done with him. So'oialo, Anesi, Masoe, and many of the Samoan discards can play for Samoa right now. Howlet, Sam Tu'itupou, Rodney Blake, Sione Lauaki, Tu'ipulotu, Olando Soakai, Vainikolo, Taumoepeau and the many Tongan discards can lift their country's playing level a bit closer to the level of powerhouse nations like England, NZ, Aus, Wales, Ireland, SA etc. At the moment, Tonga, Fiji, Samoa are struggling against second string teams and it is really sad to see talented players either playing for another country or restricted by the IRB one nation regulation. IRB need to give lots of money to these small countries to help retain their players from flooding oversea. It sucks for the small nations mr. IRB!!
Report this comment
by Barry Hatfield November 29, 2009 07:00 GMT
Short arm ELV's is a no-brainer. IRB must be predominantly European, who won't institute it because they didn't think of it.
Report this comment