Kicked into touch

So where’s South Africa’s kicking game now? Two Test defeats, two losses to club sides and a win over Italy doesn’t say much for how effective the Springboks’ game plan is does it?

This tour has been a real eye-opener for South Africa and hopefully you’ll now agree with me that the problem is that the Springboks are just too one-dimensional.

Whenever I have questioned how dull the Springboks’ approach is the bloggers have waded in with their abusive comments without even taken a second to think about what I was saying.

Yet kicking is a problem. There is simply too much of it and I notice other columnists have also started to push the debate about it.

The Springboks reached a real low point against the Irish. Their only thought was to kick the shit out of the ball – get it and kick it, anywhere.

I suppose that’s to be expected with 9, 10 and 12 from the Bulls, 15 too!, but how come no-one said, “guys this is not working let’s try something else.”

The trouble for the Boks is that they have added no refinements to the way they play. They just kick it as far as possible with absolutely no variation.

Surely if you want to play a kicking game you have to play the best kicking game possible? Where were the grubbers, the taps over the top, the diagonal kicks for someone to run onto and even the long touch-finder to gain some breathing space?

I have never said don’t kick the ball at all. It obviously has its place, but the Springboks have got to the point where to kick the ball is all they’ve got!

And I’m afraid I have to say it – Morné Steyn is not an international class flyhalf. Sure he’s a helluva goal-kicker, although he was not that effective in soft, cold conditions, but he brings nothing different to the position. He asks no questions of the opposition, tends to telegraph what he’s going to do and, as I’ve said, his first instinct is to hoof it.

And the same goes for Wynand Olivier. He’s just so predictable. Puts his ears back and has a go and Zane Kirchner also does not look like someone who might add another dimension. Ruan Pienaar, who’s meant to be South Africa’s running flyhalf, came on and instead of changing things just carried on putting boot to the ball.

You have to ask what Peter de Villiers thinks he’s doing? There’s clearly not been much coaching going on because the Boks have stagnated and it doesn’t say much for his resolve or ability as a selector that at the first sign of crisis he gave up his plan to have John Smit play tighthead.

If I’m not mistaken Smit was at 3 when South Africa beat the Lions and took the Tri-Nations so the coaches could not have been that committed to the plan if they could give it up so easily.

It also does not do much for the confidence of players to be taken on tour only to be overtaken for a Test cap by others who were not in the original squad.

There’s no doubt the cracks are showing in the Springbok façade and I can’t help but remind you of my column some two months ago in which I speculated that New Zealand 2011 might be a bridge too far for this team – to outraged reaction from South African fans. Wonder what they say now?

The weekend’s other Tests proved one of the oldest rules of this game – never take your opposition for granted.

I felt both the Welsh and the French thought they would come away with victories over the Wallabies and the All Blacks respectively and got rattled when it didn’t go their way.

Going on the first few scrums it looked as though the All Blacks were going to get flogged but they came back to put up probably the best Test performance of the year. The Blacks just have a way of delivering players who can stand up to be counted and this tour has yet again shown that you can never count them out. They also seem to have finally settled on how they want to play.

It’s been interesting to see how many commentators - coaches, former players, writers – are starting to question the appalling amount of kicking that’s been a blight on international matches.

The problem is that it’s just so easy to kill the ball, so I’ll say it again, let’s bring back rucking – it’s the only way to make the ball faster so we can get back to scoring tries rather than just kicking the ball.




Recent Blogs



Comments

by william green December 1, 2009 10:02 GMT
Now let me see, was it the wannabees or the Boks who won the tri-nations this year? Was it the wannabees or the Boks who won the B&I Lions series? Did the Bulls or the Waratahs/Brumbies/Reds/Force win the super 14? The Boks beat the All Blacks three times this year, I wonder when was the last time the wannabees beat the Blacks? Which team was was the only one to score a four-try bonus point in the tri-nations this year? The Springboks, thats who! The only one-dimensional thing I see in rugby today is you and all your negative comments about the game of rugby and how great you were and how great the wannabees were. Just look above to the headings of all your recent blogs " blame the system", "clash of cultures" etc. An absolute NEGATRON (one who enjoys spreading negativity). I am sick and tired of your negative comments of the Springbok team when the wannabees are the shittest playing rugby team of all time. So thats what this Springbok supporter has to say about the way the Boks play rugby you headless chook.
Report this comment
by Selwyn Price December 1, 2009 12:26 GMT
I seldom agree with Campese, but he was referring to the Autumn tours, with only a passing reference to previous tours this year. If you disagree with him, make your point with a valid, reasoned argument. Abuse just makes you look like a bigger dick than he is.
Report this comment
by garry angus December 1, 2009 12:48 GMT
Dear David, I always enjoy your blogs. Although not South African, I followed all the Springbok games this year and was present for the Italy test. Much was made about South African strength in depth, which has turned out to be a facade, as you rightly note. Their second stringers are head and shoulders below the rest first team, but I totally agree that the current 3,10,12 and 15 are sub-standard and Roussow and Bekker aren't international class. Having said that, the loss of Pierre Spies, Bismark dP, Juan Smith and having an unfit Bakkies Botha, Beast, Matfield and Burger has turned their pack into a quivering wreck. In addition to that, arguably the best inside centre JdV in world rugby left along with an irreplaceable full back. That is a huge casualty list. If you took Brad Thorne, Richie McCaw, Dan Carter and Mils Muliaina out of the ABs, they will also weaken considerably - hence why they lost the 3N. In fairness, most of the other positions have strong cover. If PS, BdP, JS, BB, JdV and FS are fit for 2011 then the Boks will challenge for the WC, without them (and the other regulars) they are a totally ordinary side. The Bulls & Springbok players had a long season. I'm not defending their lack of depth, but that's the reality. Instead of keeping these same, dud 2nd stringers on the bench, they need to find new players to blood over the next 2 years, otherwise matches against Fiji and Samoa are going to break them.
Report this comment
by Pdivvy December 1, 2009 17:37 GMT
Campo has been waiting all year for the Boks to falter so he can sink his teeth in. The abuse he talks about , although I admit somewhat childish is brought upon by himself. What do you think would happen if a past Springbok great blogged and basically criticized Australia directly or indirectly week in week out ???? He is enjoying his little purple patch coz the Boks had a poor tour. (after 18 months something had to give sooner or later ) But nothing can change the fact that no team ever has achieved as much in a 12 month period.....World cup champs . S14 champs. 7s champs. Lions series champs. Tri Nations . Number one ranking in union and 7s. .....NO ONE !!! He goes on and on about the kicking game but the boks are merely capitalizing on the current rules (rightly or wrongly) Dont hate the player , hate the game. Do you you wanna win or look good. (ask the ABs about that one with no web ellis since 87) And if its entertaining running fancy you rugby youre after union is not it. Union is also a forwards game Campo and its part of the game. If you want to be entertained with running rugby , watch sevens ......... Oh wait hold on .... SA are champs of that too !!!! Nuff said
Report this comment
by Peter December 1, 2009 22:32 GMT
I agree with Campo about M.Steyn, he really is a boring flyhalf. His1st instinct is to kick, second to pass and third to run. There is nothing wrong with a distributor flyhalf but a flyhalf must vary his apporach within the game to keep the opposition guessing. Steyn looks like he has no ideas and is really just looking for an opportunity to drop for goal. Oh, and his defence isn't that good either. Yes the boks deserved team of the year for the trinations and lions series but like campo said, recently they have not been able to show anything special. It does reflect on a weakness in coaching when the game plan fails and is still implimented. The boks have amazing runners of the ball, they showed that in Perth, why don't they risk the run?
Report this comment
by Jason Fell December 1, 2009 23:39 GMT
Great feedback yet again..you have a real touch with the readers Campo. I think it was one of your best articles. May I point out however (rather than wading in as some retards above did) that I really do feel some of the OZ players are below international class level. Will Genia is a real find, for sure. But Quade Cooper, Dean Mumm, Drew Mitchell, James O'Conner, Ryan Cross and Wycliff Palu are below standard. I'm sure there are some others as well. Depth is a pretty bad problem in Australian rugby. Being a Kiwi, I knowe who I'd rather the AB's face on the pitch....and it aint SA.
Report this comment
by Eben VR December 2, 2009 00:28 GMT
Campo must be SO relieved something has finally gone wrong for the Springboks! He's probably walking around with a permanent smile (while telling each and everyone who crosses his path about 'the glory days' when rugby was still rugby). JaY summed it up well enough. The Boks have adapted the best to the new rules, and they have enough talent to be the world's best. Up to the point where they're bodies basically give in. Now, I will concede that Wynand, Morne, Kirchner are definitely not 3D enough to be boks. Kirchner lacks vision (and I doubt his intelligence after seeing him interviewed!), Wynand just tries to outmuscle opposition (good luck against the South Pacific Islands, Wynand) and Morne's defense and running game is weak. Pienaar needs to stay on the bench as a no.9 or 10 replacement, because he has been screwed around so much he doesn't even know the time of day, let alone how to be a specialist anything. Amazing how the SOuth African teams managed to win so much this year, when they "don't have the depth! " (Campo better start praying they don't develop any real depth) Bring back rucking! I agree with that. The first team to adapt to the new rules will have the edge. Just like now. Then again, if the boks adapt first to the 'new rucking rules', then Campo will talk about the Bokthugs who hurt innocent wallabies. WE GET IT: This is a no win situation for the boks (and their fans)
Report this comment
by Robert Chin December 2, 2009 06:23 GMT
Honestly, and ironically, i also remembered the "bridge too far" column from couple of weeks back after boks' NH tour. Results from this tour will turn out to be the very positive thing for boks, in preparing 2011. Little David, for a change, why don't you write something to "brag" about how "multi-dimensional" your wallabies are!
Report this comment
by SuperBru December 2, 2009 09:49 GMT
Agree with you David.Too much kicking.It does not seem that any of the boks want to hold on to the ball.The game plan is simple.Kick and hope for the best.Boy do we miss Butch James.
Report this comment
by Skip December 2, 2009 14:02 GMT
stop going on about the TN and the lions or you'll end up like English fans I used to know who went on about the 88 side beating Australia long after their own side was sliding. The point is, the Boks are beatable once the kicking game fails and their pack is met head on and they have no plan B, as their last 5 matches suggest. PDVs selections are evidence enough of some concerning things and an end of year tour that leads just one win is pause for thought. I thought they had it cracked in Perth when they went and ran for 25 mins and scored 4 quick tries, but since then it's been back to type and to watch them fail to adapt so often is the point up for debate here, not went 4 months ago.
Report this comment
by Pdivvy December 3, 2009 01:42 GMT
Youre right skip. Its better to be modest . But if your team is being told they are worthless etc etc bla bla after this year s achievments, I guess most fans would get on their soapbox in defence right. And the year is not even over yet so your comparison to the English is a bit of an exaggeration . I mean of course if the brash aussies ,smug kiwis or arrogant poms had done the same none of you guys would bragg at all would you . No ..... never. !!!!
Report this comment
by william green December 3, 2009 10:09 GMT
Well said Jay. As a bok supporter, it not easy to just sit back and watch/listen as other people bash your team who have done so well this year especially if their own teams have not been anywhere near the mark. The boks have had a good year and yes we can all see that there are some weaknesses that became evident toward latter games, but like all true champions, I have no doubt that these will be looked at very closely and will be fixed. So all these people who are trying to remove the gloss from a very fine season for the Boks, pleeze lay off man and let us enjoy our glory, even if you think its short lived.
Report this comment
by Eugene ?? December 3, 2009 15:37 GMT
Whatever,we won more this year than any other team, we won the games that counted. We also got IRB team of the year. what did the Lions, NZ and the wobblies win this year??? NOTHING!!! It's a bit of a shame that we lost against France and Ireland, but rather lose the games that don't matter than the games that do. Australia lost all the games that did matter, so Campo's hurting a bit. We lost games that didn't matter, we're not hurting at all because we're World Champions, Tri Nations Champions, Lions series winnners, Sevens series winnners and Bulls are Super 14 Champions. What's OZ got? NOTHING, 0, last place absolute wooden spoon looooooooooooooooooooooooooooosers :) :) :) better luck next time buddy.
Report this comment
by Eben VR December 4, 2009 02:57 GMT
Here's some topics for your next article: 1.) God I hate the Boks. 2.) 2009, the year I almost died 3.) Why won't the boks just die? 4.) When I was still playing... {In twelve parts} 5.) Bring back rucking - it might stop the Boks! 6.) 103 reasons why I hate the colour green 7.) Why I love Luke Watson 8.) The Glory Days (before the Boks came and ruined everything) 9.) I went on safari to shoot a bok... 10.) God I hate the Boks, Part 2... Cut them out, put them in a hat. It might help you to get over the trauma of 2009. We promise not to object while you keep beating the dead horse. Besides, it is almost 2010.
Report this comment
by petros halkas December 4, 2009 06:19 GMT
Campo is 100% right. When I see fellow Sa's saying, "we won everything, what did you win? or Campo dislikes the Boks etc", I get ill and want to klap some sense into those idiot heads. Against Ireland we only kicked. Everything was kicked away. Give the ball enough times to the other team and sooner or later they will punish you. Teams have also learned to cleverly delay our chasers. Piet Snor hasn't got a clue about coaching players with more knowledge than him. Same goes for Gold and Muir. I am willing to also bet that there is severe friction between Muir and Snor. Always a pleasure and an honour to watch the Boks in full flight, instead of defending and waiting for scraps/mistakes, like hyena's.
Report this comment
by Pdivvy December 4, 2009 23:57 GMT
Petrus.... SA rugby will never be pretty. Our history is translated into the way we play.(need I say more) We have great individual players but there is an old saying.... Kiwis have skill , Ozzies have tactics , boks have physique. (think about our history) Union is not all about running rugby. Its not all about the backs. There are so many facets to the game. If people want running rugby.... watch sevens......... And BTW our 7s team is not so bad ???? SA rugby will nevenr be pretty sorry. But the phallasy that bok rugby is stupid and are meatheads. Eddie Jones said he had never come across such astute rugby brains as Smit , Matfield and Du Preez. Just like the stigma of oz scrums being weak as piss. They are leading the way at the moment. Petrus........ accept how we are , roll your sleeves up and back your heritage through thick and thin. Do u wanna win or look good ????Dont hate the playa ... hate the game
Report this comment
by Alfred Thomas December 5, 2009 00:51 GMT
Hahaha, some of these comments is funny! Well Campo if you want to dish out criticism, expect some coming back at you! hahaha. Did the boks play bad at the year end tour - Yes Dis they kick all their precious ball to kingdom come - Yes Was there anything wrong with their play at the year end tour - Yes Did they kick wallaby and kiwi ass this year - Yes Was there anything wrong with their play before the year end tour - No Are the Boks one dimensional - No Do the Wallabies have any dimension - No Good luck next year!
Report this comment
by Eugene ?? December 5, 2009 06:57 GMT
Hey Petros we won everything!
Report this comment
by ruan tredoux December 6, 2009 04:33 GMT
campo...you suck...you suck ...and.....YOU SUCK....stop critisizing, try to be unbiased and maybe people will have respect for your opinion too....right now...YOU SUCK! great year boks! well done...lets keep our heads high and start looking fwd to the next world cup title! go bokke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ruan tredoux - toronto.
Report this comment
by Nicholas Hunter December 6, 2009 07:14 GMT
These comments are hilarious, especially the one about "backing your heritage" that was finished up with an African-American punchline. Trash analysis. I also love the quip about how badly the RSA team suffered due to injuries or absences. Springboks lost to a CLUB TEAM that was missing 14 FIRST CHOICE PLAYERS. Let me reiterate so you can maybe see where the Bok criticism is coming from: Springboks lost to LEICESTER "B" !!! In the last few months, the Springboks have faltered, and most of what South Africa rugby fans have to offer in defense is that PdV is a moron and racial politics are ruining their game. Is that all RSA fans have to offer? You can do so much better than that with a little thought. <<>>
Report this comment
by Nicholas Hunter December 6, 2009 07:18 GMT
(This got cut off from above.) What South Africa rugby history is, is greatness. They are tripping up right now with a tour that served largely to experiment, let's not forget. They have been excellent always, and will sit on top again, perhaps soon even. That's what Springboks do. They fight hard and fix mistakes. Most of Campo's article is a lament on why they haven't fixed this one yet. Until RSA figure it out and come back stronger, why don't some of you crazies hold your tongues a bit and maintain some respect for other Bok fans?
Report this comment
by Anton du Preez December 6, 2009 14:59 GMT
Campo, reminds me of the eighties when all the Western Province supporters complained that Naas Botha was killing the game with kicking while they were trying to play "entertaining" rugby by scoring tries. The "Blou Bulle" kept on winning and Province kept on whining. Since Campo likes to harp about the good old days, I would like to thank him for giving me the GREAT memory of Pieter Hendricks passing him on the outside to start the decline of that great Aussie team in the 95 world cup. Campo is ultimately qualified to express an opinion of going to the world cup with a team that is past it's best
Report this comment