Rape and pillage

Where would rugby be without the Pacific Islanders?

This thought occurred to me while watching, on TV, the recent Sevens tournaments in Dubai and George and the Heineken Cup in the UK and Europe – although with the latter only briefly because you can hardly call it rugby.

You click onto rugby in the northern hemisphere and it’s like watching a different game – a form of mud wrestling. Everyone off their feet, everyone off-sides and they tell us the game is being played to the same set of rules!

But one thing that did strike me is how many islanders are turning out in top sides – England even had a Fijian in their Sevens side!

I just hope they are being well looked after but somehow I doubt it. People are very poor on the islands and the players, most of them born to play rugby, are forced to leave their homes to eke out a living and I’m sure many of them are paid peanuts compared with what is shelled out to Springboks, All Blacks and Wallabies.

But here’s a challenge. Take out the islanders and how good would some countries be then? – Australia included.

What I’d like to see ahead of the 2011 World Cup is a real effort by the IRB to level the playing the fields and give each country a fair crack at it.

Apart from a system in which the home countries, the like of Tonga, Fiji and Samoa, should be compensated for their players there should be a rule, sponsored by the IRB if necessary, that every country should play the same amount of warm-up matches with their full squads.

The islands seldom have their best teams available because their players are tied up by contracts but let them prepare properly and have an extended time together and I can guarantee you’ll see some shake-ups in the World Cup.

It goes without saying that, at the end of another year, I’m feeling quite pessimistic about the state of the game.

It makes me see red when I see officials interviewed, like now at the Sevens tournaments, and they drone on about how wonderful the game is when in fact it’s crap.

Sevens used to be full of guile and skill but now it’s played according to XVs rules with teams kicking for touch and taking the ball into contact.

I can already see the blogs, “there he goes again, whingeing Aussie,” but once again let me emphasise that I feel the way I do because I love this game, am passionate about it and care about it.

I want the game to be the way it should be played and I don’t see the twits in charge even acknowledging that there’s something wrong; never mind doing anything about it.

There’s a massive issue with referees and the inconsistency with which the laws are applied, it’s too easy and safe to kick the ball so there’s too much of it; the breakdown is a mess; and overall the game is just too boring to compete with other codes.

I notice that Richie McCaw and Lawrence Dallaglio, among others, have supported my call for a return to rucking but you can be damned sure that it won’t be heard in Dublin; drowned out by the sound of the IRB worthies slapping each other on their backs, congratulating themselves on how great it all is and how wonderful they are while more and more water seeps into the hull of the good ship Rugby!

And that’s my final word for 2009 – at least on this forum! Have a happy Christmas and a rucking good New Year!

Sincerely, David.


Recent Blogs



Comments

by Pdivvy December 15, 2009 11:31 GMT
When Campo is not having an unnecessary go at South African rugby he has a few good points......If They struck oil , gold or diamonds in Polynesia .....NZ rugby would be in dire straights !!!! And I like Campos last few paragraphs about the the IRB muppet show in Dublin.
Report this comment
by Peter December 15, 2009 21:16 GMT
The island nations are exploited by the IRB. They take all the best players for club rugby and other top nations like NZ and AUS and leave the island national teams to fend for themselves. The IRB is a poorly run institution, politically speaking (in my view) and it hurts the game of rugby as a whole.
Report this comment
by Nicholas Hunter December 15, 2009 23:44 GMT
This is a woe similar to campaign finance reform. Several things are needed for the islands, including IRB enforced contract exemptions and Super 14 domestic competition. If the IRB guaranteed clauses in every player from the pacific islands' contract that the player must be granted appropriate amounts of leave to prepare with and play for his home nation's national side, fewer islanders would be signed to euro contracts and the ones that were would be able to represent their homes. This would only work, however, in tandem with an effort that provided the islands with access to well-paid professional competition for island residents, like an IRB-funded franchise in the Super 1X. It's not killing the diversity of teams, it's simply making the choice to play elsewhere a more healthy option, rather than a restrictive necessity.
Report this comment
by Nicholas Hunter December 15, 2009 23:44 GMT
This is a woe similar to campaign finance reform. Several things are needed for the islands, including IRB enforced contract exemptions and Super 14 domestic competition. If the IRB guaranteed clauses in every player from the pacific islands' contract that the player must be granted appropriate amounts of leave to prepare with and play for his home nation's national side, fewer islanders would be signed to euro contracts and the ones that were would be able to represent their homes. This would only work, however, in tandem with an effort that provided the islands with access to well-paid professional competition for island residents, like an IRB-funded franchise in the Super 1X. It's not killing the diversity of teams, it's simply making the choice to play elsewhere a more healthy option, rather than a restrictive necessity.
Report this comment
by Jason Fell December 16, 2009 00:19 GMT
What utter crap. Your worst article yet Campo. There are plenty of NZ, SA, ARG players plying their trade in Europe. The Pacific Island team have the players and the talent, but not the infrastructure and dedicated funds. What they needed more than anything is a Super 14 team, leading into a Tri-Nations berth with Argentina competing as well, and you aussies pilferd that. Which leads to my second point.... Why is it so necessary to have a fifth (after the WF already raped and pillaged QLD some years back) OZ team based in Melbourne. I'll tell you why - because of this nonsense and I quote you - "competing with other codes". Ask anyone in SA or NZ....we still love the game, we watch it and we follow it passionately. You are an ex-player who thinks back to the glory days of Australian rugby and wonder what has happened. Blame the NRL and the AFL and even 'gasp' soccer all you want, but the fact is the Australian provincial competition sucks and never adapted to the professional era at all. The rest of the world is packing stadiums...even in Italy where they live and breathe soccer. What a pack of whingers you aussies really are.
Report this comment
by william green December 16, 2009 03:43 GMT
I have to agree with you on the inconsistencies at which the referees apply the laws. It boils down to the referees having different interpretations of the laws that seems to be the root cause of most of the problems. It also seems as though referees are not being held accountable for the many poor descisions that they make which results in so many upsets in very high-profile games. As far as the islanders are concerned, I do not know/understand the dynamics of their situation, but I know one thing for sure, THEY ARE HUGELY TALENTED. With that, I want to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a Prosperous New Year.
Report this comment
by Bill Greenwell December 17, 2009 02:08 GMT
Piss off Campo. Your comments on the Heineken games confirm that you don't even watch them. Suggest you tune in to that latest Sale /Harlequins game. Lovely flowing rugby. The sort of quality we appreciate here in Canada, whatever hemisphere it's played in. Don't make me burn my lovely Aussie jersey, but reading your myopic stuff occasionally makes me feel inclined.
Report this comment
by 68 CHARGER December 18, 2009 19:35 GMT
hmmm Jay what you forget to realize is that New Zealand is really the capital of polynesia, as is hawaii. New Zealand was inhabited by the Maorioris, Maori's, who are polynesians!! Dumb a## ! We have been there for ever. Maybe you should go back to history , geography 101 and do some study!!!! Without New Zealand you never would have been able to see any of our polynesian brothers grace the rugby stage!!!!! As for your comments campo i would agree with the ref. situation. It is too loose with the interpretations of other nations playing the game. And if that is the case the northern hem. refs should just stay there!!!! There is some great rugby being played in the northern hem. but it is being slowed down by the refs and stopping it from being better. Merry christmas and happy holidays!
Report this comment
by Robert Pieterse December 18, 2009 23:24 GMT
If AUS were on top of there game (which they havent been in a while) you would only hear great things about the game come out of his sad lil mouth. Called the goose step because ur a goose mate. merry christmas from Amsterdam
Report this comment
by Pdivvy December 19, 2009 19:50 GMT
Charger....New Zealand are the Island raiders like or not. Didnt see many Fijians , Samoans or Tongans in a 30's 40's 50's or 60's All Blacks teams . ?????
Report this comment
by Nils theLatvian December 26, 2009 13:44 GMT
Yeah, Jay, Kiwis raided islands for years and brought home full ships with rugby slaves in chains. Like 2 year old slave Muliaina or 5 year old slave Rokocoko or many others. And even worse - they knew well in advance good prospects so they poached their parents/grandparents to force them come in NZ and give birth to all those in NZ born players of Fijian, Samoan and Tongan decent. Cunning bastards, I tell you.
Report this comment
by Pdivvy December 27, 2009 15:19 GMT
Good one. Very amusing. Wanna hear another one ? New Zealand are also introducing a quota system for theyre rugby teams...... at least five white New Zealanders in each team ! :-)
Report this comment
by andrea brittany December 29, 2009 23:56 GMT
South africa does not have islanders, currents champs. curious isn't it.
Report this comment
by Christiaan Pienaar December 31, 2009 21:33 GMT
Well said Andrea! And about your referee problem, just call Piet van Zyl!!
Report this comment
by James Swindells January 9, 2010 16:21 GMT
I for one would welcome the reinstatement of rucking. There is nothing quite so motivating to move out of the way of the ball than a set of studs playing a tune on your ribs. Would definately speed up the second phase ball. As to the standards of referees this year, the less said the better. and that applies to all refs from all nations. Now I wonder what we will get served up on the streams this year on Rugby zone? this islast chance, I have supported it since the start, but am slowly getting peeved at the fare served up here.
Report this comment
by andries breedt January 17, 2010 21:07 GMT
Campo, your comments on South Africa are old and boring, move on mate, and think outside the box for a change
Report this comment
by Flying Wing March 5, 2010 21:58 GMT
Campo where are you!? I was afraid this would happen. After taking a beating in the comment boxes we lost you. I'm a SAfa and despite the fact that I rarely agreed with your statements I still enjoyed them very much. Always good to hear a variety of comments. Ignore all the yapping and common back! Or put another way: RZ, bring back the Campo blog!!!
Report this comment
by G Trotter March 6, 2010 00:42 GMT
NZ and aussie both pillaged the island nations aswell as the northern hemisphere leagues and use them then dump them , but the worst thing about it all is they aren,t allowed to go and play for there nation of birth if they don,t make the AB,s or aussies etc which is crap as it would only make the games more compeditive which i think they are afraid of i think they should be able to play for who ever the want to which will only make the game better world wide
Report this comment
by Pierre van Vuuren_51 March 17, 2010 18:25 GMT
Wonder what Campo thinks of the way the referees is going about the laws now? Would probably still find something to complain about I am sure
Report this comment
by Khanya Ngonyama March 18, 2010 23:09 GMT
This is a good one Campo. I saw this at the 2007 World Cup when I saw the depleted resources of the island nations because It did not make sense to me that these Pacific Islanders are so good in the 7's game but not that competitive in the XV game. As a passionate rugby fan, I was wondering if I was the only one seeing this depletion of players from these countries. Now I'm glad to see a legend sees it too.
Report this comment
by paul April 9, 2010 01:12 GMT
New Zealand has a lot of players that are from the pacific islands. The world cup would be awesome with no pacific islanders it would not have the tallent. If rucking came back, being on the wrong side of the ball, it would hurt. All Blacks rule and so do crusaders liam: AGE 10 North Carolina, USA Rugby Rocks
Report this comment
by Flying Wing April 9, 2010 04:07 GMT
David, come back!!! We need you to spice things up on this site. Are you listening RZ? Probably not...
Report this comment
by James Swindells May 2, 2010 09:13 GMT
I agree with Flying Wing Campo, where have you gone, I too get wound up by your comments about the SA teams, but despite that enjoy your blogs. I did expect you to have a lot to say about the Super 14. the difference betwen the northern and southern hemisphere rugby is dissapointing, I much prefer the SH styles. As for the IRB muppet show the less said the better. And about rucking, it gets my vote too, would put paid to the guys lying over the ball and preventing it coming out, I remember my SA school rugby days and the bruises that hurt for a couple of days afterwards when you were in the wrong place at the right time.. LOL
Report this comment
by Greg Stewart July 10, 2010 15:18 GMT
Living in USA, it is disheartening to hear the American commentators refer to the Boks vs All Blacks clash as "the fast cultured rugby against the big dumb rugby"...... the unfortunate part about it is that it is true. Muir is coaching this team the way he coached the Lions..... kick "up and unders" onto the best full-back in the world, and see if he runs holes thru us !!!! HELLO guys what are you thinking, or are you doing the "stupid coach" bit as well???. Not to mention Januarie, who I always assumed just played slowly from the ruck.... but that is not it... he THINKS slowly from the ruck, which is worse.... anyway, they got what they deserved...and it will be repeated next week as well......THUMPED
Report this comment
by Mark Moolman July 13, 2010 01:51 GMT
@Greg Stewart - you got a short memory....Last year every available trophey was in South Africa...we already have the the super14 and the tri-nations just started.......A big kick in the ass was what we needed as our boys with getting to confident, now we have been brought down to earth with a bit of a headache...As for the american commentators refering to us as big dumb rugby!!!! Come on - we all know thats not true.....Our boys are champions...............
Report this comment
by Jason Fell July 13, 2010 19:52 GMT
But maybe Botha could wear that tag ya?
Report this comment
by runitbro July 19, 2010 00:13 GMT
by Pdivvy December 19, 2009 19:50 GMT "Charger....New Zealand are the Island raiders like or not. Didnt see many Fijians , Samoans or Tongans in a 30's 40's 50's or 60's All Blacks teams . ?????" Seriously, you made an arse of yourself. Unfortunately you are not alone in spouting such uninformed garbage. Any quick look at NZ's history would clearly show you the migratory patterns that have changed over time; there may not have been a lot of Samoans, Fijians, Togans in the ABs earlier because there were not the huge numbers of them in NZ that you see today. Auckland is the biggest Polynesian city in the world! And you seem to forget too, that NZ is a "Pacific Island" nation!
Report this comment
by Greg Stewart July 19, 2010 14:48 GMT
Mark Moolman, if you remember correctly last year it was the Boks who played fast, smart rugby. Do you see that this year? We won everything because of the type of rugby played, which is NOT being played this year. This weekend it was like Peter DV said "good job last week boys, lets do the same again... it is bound to work this week". PLAY like last year, pleeeease !!!! Good thing this week was when Ruan came on, he moved the ball out of the ruck (when Januarie doesnt do), and immediately we had front foot ball.... which Januarie cant do (on account of his slow thinking.. which serves to get the defense re-aligned). ... so that was one positive, amongst a good old thumping.
Report this comment
by Greg Stewart July 25, 2010 14:52 GMT
The commentators (Skinstad) said after 50 minutes: it looks like Peter DV has given up on this game, sending in the subs.... what was amazing is that it took so long... he should have given up after 15 minutes. The Wallabies are horrible, and now only two steps above the Boks.... I would like to know exactly who the 48% of the voters in the poll are who think the Boks will win the Tri-nations this year???? Peter DV... if you are playing teams with better loose forwards, you cannot send the big dummies running straight, head-down, into the defense, because their loose-forwards (i.e. Pocock) will simply take the ball off you in the mall. If your loose forwards are too slow to get there in time, you will loose the ball in the ruck .... even schoolboys know this !!!! Pocock and Elsom made Burger and Spies look like amateurs ....so sad...
Report this comment