All in Good Spirit

In the wake of the Harlequins’ fake blood injury affair in which the club was fined £215,000, given a lengthy player suspension along with their Director of Rugby being forced to resign, I thought I would share something that happened in a team I played with over 10 years ago.

A player was asked to bleed for the team. This was in order to allow a young and fairly inexperienced player some minutes on field – without risk of losing the match. If the new player did not go well, the player pulled off for bleeding would return on field within the allotted period. The player thought the coach was joking. But when game day rolled around, he was greeted by the team doctor with scalpel in hand. The player had the top of his head cut open and was promptly stitched back up.

At some point during the game, the stitches were removed, blood flowed and the player was replaced. Looking back on it now, although legal, it was pretty horrific.

It begs the question “How far would you go in order to win?” A coach constantly reviews the rules to find a way to win. At what point does it become cheating? Or rules are being exploited, are we not acting in the proper spirit of the game?

In the situation I described, nobody technically acted in an illegal way, but was it in the spirit of the game? If the Harlequins had cut the player in front of everyone, is that doing the right thing? Unfortunately the things that matter to club boards and owners hiring the coaches are the trophies in the cabinet.

Is it in the spirit of the game if a national side is full of players from other countries, who qualify by parentage and a passport technicality only?

Is it in the spirit of the game if a trainer is giving players a legal substance that gives an overt advantage to his team?

From my perspective, this where the water get very murky - between what is legal and what is fair. We all have different ways in which to judge our own actions. I know some players that will happily cheat if they can get away with it and others who will bend the laws and feel no sense of duty to the game.

In many cases it is the underdog in a game of rugby who will do whatever it takes to restore their personal pride and win. They feel they may have been so disadvantaged in other areas that they have to cheat to compete.

The answer, in my view, to what is right comes with the question "Can I sleep comfortably knowing I did this?"

In most cases, tightening up the rulebook and knowing which rules are important and which to enforce will clear the water. My feeling is that there should also be a ‘Spirit of the Game’ ruling whereby a referee can say “You know what, it may be legal, but this is not why we play the game.”


Recent Blogs



Comments

by ryan karim August 18, 2009 15:35 GMT
What you just described Ben can only be cheating in my view. If you cannot beat the opposition with what you have then accept the fact and get better, no need for Hollywood tricks. Rugby is "supposed" to be a thugs game played by gentlemen, why not behave as such, or the next thing you know we'll have rugga players rolling on the ground and yelling blue murder when they get tackled aka...soccer. Hope this never happens.
Report this comment
by jesse ramsay August 19, 2009 06:34 GMT
Ben, I think you have the right of it. what is the value of victory if it was won without honor? I don't mean cheating like hands in the ruck or offside players but things such as what happened in the situation you described or players "headhunting" the star player on the other team. I for one do not want any part of that victory as a fan, as a player, as a coach! Rugby is war but war has terms of honor and so too should rugby. As always Mr Darwin your columms are inciteful and informative and for that I thank you
Report this comment
by M Ross August 19, 2009 06:49 GMT
Rugby already provides the referee with discretion through the global mandate of "unsportsmanlike conduct". I think that in the professional era the financial rationalizaion of unethical or unsportsmanlike behaviour such as cheating of this sort undermines the integrity of the sport and sets a bad example for the rest of the game at all levels. The "professional foul" of slowing down the game and interfering with the ball in the rucks are praised by commentators when a try is saved and only a penalty conceded, but is this really the game we want to watch. I do agree with Campo that while winning, the kick and chase game is far from attractive and we need to encourage more free flow of the ball. Schoolboy rugby is still often the most exciting for this reason. Will the wings SA has it is a shame that in three Tri-Nations games I do not recall the ball getting all the way out once! Sorry for the essay!
Report this comment
by James Swindells August 21, 2009 06:44 GMT
Interesting piece, I agree with th comment about honour. The game must be played and won fair and square. I would prefer to see such unsportsman like behaviour rewarded with a complete banning.
Report this comment